Dumb thought: Anyone ever compared an L7 and an L300 side-by-side?
I know; it's a dumb question undeserving of an answer from this erudite forum. Though I've made my intention clear to buy an L300 pair or a 43xx equivalent or better as a house-warming present to myself whenever I build my family the new house I've been promising for a little over a decade. Doesn't seem to be any real hurry since they all seem to be leaving home if I wait long enough. ;)
But in listening to a new purchase tonight:
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA240_.jpg
I just have to ask. Has anyone compared the lowly L7 to an L300 Summit side-by-side using the same system to compare the sound? What I'm saying is that the L7 continues to floor me, but I've lusted in my heart for an L300 since they first came out. I've just got to know how they compare. Double-bass and cello sound superb on the L7s. how much better should I expect the L300 to make the music sound?
Oh yeah, and by-the-way the CD is great. I saw Rushad Eggleston play cello with Darol Anger once and I was hooked.
alternative/non-popular answer
Phil
My answer doesnt have too much to do with sound quality. I have heard the L7's demoed and they sounded great, tho I didnt like the burnt ash vinyl cladding or general looks. I know you are a collector and enjoy classic, beautiful items (BMW's)
Member Soundboy and I had discussions about your question ( substitute 250ti for L7) ...
.he called the L300 a "'59 Cadillac" ...big, flashy , fun to cruise around for a while, but tiring in everyday life. He has heard both and like others here, had said the L300 is 1970's technology and if that is what you want, then go for it.
Maybe the L300's are just something you have always wanted, but could'nt swing for until now ? I'm having trouble believing that they sound $2k/3k/4k better than the L7's.
Not trying to flame anyone with L300's, maybe just trying to slow the bandwagon a bit.