Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 64

Thread: 4430 help!

  1. #31
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    I prefer this style

    Actually its a 3135 clone!
    I think it looks more "reliable" than the originals.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #32
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch
    The only item in question is L1 with too low DCR. Maybe put a resistor in series with it, 0.06 Ohms? I do find them in surface-mount metal strip and wirewound versions, about $1.50. That's more like a fuse, actually. :
    Yeah! series resistor will do it. Or just forget about that as you anyway have the rheostat in series.

  3. #33
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Goodo JOB, Guido. You set a standard for the rest of us.

    I have some fiberglass Vectorboard here, so I may build like Rob did. Just gotta find the pins....

    Point being, nobody who can handle a soldering iron should feel intimidated about building these themselves.

    Quote Originally Posted by Guido
    Yeah! series resistor will do it. Or just forget about that as you anyway have the rheostat in series.
    That's what I thought at first, too. But, I looked again, and the rheostat and inductor are separated by the capacitor, so it's not the same.

    Best answer is the proper smaller-wire inductor (22 Ga. air core, looks like), of course, but for now, I'll order some of them tiny resistors....

    [Edit: Spreadsheet again updated, parts ordered. All in stock except 1.80 mH coil, B/O. I bought the PE 260-274 dual faceplate with 260-252 L-Pads instead, tho, for a little upgrade. ]

    Who knows a source for these 0.04 mH inductors? This is the laminate-core version, 20 Ga.:

    [Note proprietary "Gob o' Snot" mounting methodology.... ]
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  4. #34
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    In the context of what these are selling for, DIY is not the most economical route.

    BUT, ours're gonna be better!

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...762120683&rd=1

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...757445158&rd=1

    Who the Hell is parting out 4435's? Sheesh!!!

    I'm not ignoring everyones' suggestions to do the biased version. Just wanna see how doing it straight works, first....

  5. #35
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,744
    "Point being, nobody who can handle a soldering iron should feel intimidated about building these themselves."

    Sorry to bring it up, but I inferred from your post on the 2403 thread that you can't handle a soldering iron....

    Widget

  6. #36
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Nope, soldering's not a problem. It's screwdrivers (and Sawzalls) that get me in trubble....

    These, too:
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  7. #37
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    $20 enclosed rotary switches are higher quality than used in factory crossovers. Actually 6-pole 4-position, simply moving the shaft stop converts them to the 2-position operation we need.

    Rated 0.5 A switching and 15 A continuous, they should work fine in this application. That'd be 1800 W across 8 Ohms. It'd take 120 V to do it.

    They could also be used to switch other options in and out, as well, though I can't think of any right now.

    Our other lead on a switch turned out to be $119 each and a minimum $500 order. Nope.

    Having the 6 poles, they could also serve N4333 (6 circuits) and possibly other int/ext switching needs as well.

    1.5" across the terminals, 1/4" shaft with knob flat. Low value metal strip resistors, rear:
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  8. #38
    Senior Member Uncle Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oregon City, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    388

    Sweet!

    Thanks for dogging those rotary switches down

  9. #39
    Junior Member ricesinice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    12
    Well, thank you guys for getting me on the right path. I ordered a bunch of parts from Parts Express, and wound my own coils (almost to dcr specs!). Finished one and hooked it up, and the sound is better than my own homebrew crossover. I did notice that the speakers sounded, and measured best with pot R201 all the way over to about 1 ohm resistance. So, if you are having a hard time with that part you really might think about using a resistor in place of it.

    Now on to building the second crossover!

  10. #40
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by ricesinice
    So, if you are having a hard time with that part you really might think about using a resistor in place of it.
    Good point. Those things have sufficient slop in them that a set of fixed 1% resistors might be a nice option. Something like how the straps are on the UHF of a 250Ti. Four levels set at 1 dB or 1/2 dB increments maybe. I believe the S9800 is 3/4 dB increments but I can't remember for sure. Whatever.

  11. #41
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Quote Originally Posted by ricesinice
    I ordered a bunch of parts from Parts Express, and wound my own coils (almost to dcr specs!).
    How about providing us a little tutorial on winding our own inductors, with pics, of course, posted here?

    Please also provide recomended types, sizes and sources of wire, coil forms or bobbins, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by ricesinice
    I did notice that the speakers sounded, and measured best with pot R201 all the way over to about 1 ohm resistance.
    Yup, "0" is nearly full on....

    Quote Originally Posted by ricesinice
    Finished one and hooked it up, and the sound is better than my own homebrew crossover.
    You musta got the "magic" part right!

    [We want PICS!]


  12. #42
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963

    Switch options:

    Laying out my DIY N3134's, I have come up with additional options for the two surplus positions on the switch, which derive from work experimenting with various applications of it here:

    #1: Passive per original.

    #2: Biwire - splits the LF and HF sections without changing out any components. Good for separately driving the two sections with multiple amps. Zilch runs this way with Q=2 bump at 25 Hz on UltraCurve.

    #3: Biamp per original. Use external 5235 crossover with 4430/35 cards or other, as desired. Zilchster preferred configuration using 5235 bump filter.

    #4: Drivers only - well, not really. Leaves the 20 uF in series with the compression driver for protection against mishaps below 1 kHz (a Zilch exclusive). Bypasses the Zoebel in the LF, tho, per N3135. For users who just MUST exercise their parametric EQ's.

    Anybody have other suggestions for this switched options upgrade?

  13. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    Quote Originally Posted by Earl K
    Thanks Rob for demonstrating that the "purpose" for that circuit leg ( in which R202 is located ) - is to "restore balance" to the horns' lower midrange frequencies. This particular frequency range has been severely depressed in the other ( UHF contour ) circuit leg.

    Of course, if a person knew their own preference for "midrange balance' - then R202 could be omitted & replaced by either 2 or 3 resistors ( depending on if a person wanted an Lpad or Tpad ).


    The actual theory of operation is quite intuitive, particularly if you have a chance to read the white paper on the 44xx published in the early 80's AES.

    About two years ago now Robert Hamel an I reverse engineered and tweaked the arse out of these networks to get the desired results with the 2122H / 2123H mid cone , which I might add is impressive at least down in Robert's cellar I thought so! But then again all Robert's diy systems are Fab.

    The attached files show my system and the resulting curve....I would love to tweak this network for a Tad 2001 some day. The curve here is that of the DR2425 dia used with the 2420 alinco driver. The network to the 2122H used 3135 crossover which is a special 2nd order filter with minimal group delay, the 2122H (or 2235 ) and the compression driver are " IN PHASE".

    I recall publishing a number of graphics in PC paint to explain the action of the variable pots in one of the earlier forums. The effect of the Pad in the 2 khertz area is mid presence, I prefered it nearly up full most of the time, this gives nice holograhic centre image.

    However, for those keen enough to build up clones you are best served with an analyser (Gated) to adjust the overall response for a flat curve extending to 16.5 khertz or so.

    Ian
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  14. #44
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    Nice calendar Ian

    I like the 2344 / 2122 Combo.
    Ooops and the 2245 of course.

  15. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    That's my darling Elle, our super model.

    Ian

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. monitor 4430 , the best ?
    By herve M in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-10-2005, 10:53 AM
  2. 2420 on 4430
    By gerard in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-24-2004, 06:51 PM
  3. 4430 crossovers
    By Figge in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-14-2004, 03:32 PM
  4. Measurements at 4430 Cabinet
    By Guido in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-05-2003, 07:48 PM
  5. JBL 4430 vs 43XX balance argument
    By slxrti in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-13-2003, 08:21 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •