Heh, heh....
Screen shot jpeg's are pretty big, 104K. Gotta work on a protocol here.
Surprised it even runs on this worthless old piece-o'-crap Compaq Win98SE system.
It's certainly no wonder them old LE14A's sound bad before refoaming.
Heh, heh....
Screen shot jpeg's are pretty big, 104K. Gotta work on a protocol here.
Surprised it even runs on this worthless old piece-o'-crap Compaq Win98SE system.
It's certainly no wonder them old LE14A's sound bad before refoaming.
I honestly can't believe everyone didn't take advantage of the free recones JBL did for so many years to replace Lans-a-Loy.
Good thing for JBL (and all of us) the WWW didn't exist yet or they'd have gone under fulfilling all the warranty claims.
We did not know. I would not have sold off my 4 LE-14A's except that no-one seemed to have the proper surrounds.
Oh well, they are gone for some time now and it don't matter.
Ron
I think it was around 1985 when JBL finally did away with the free recones for all transducers with Lans-a-Loy surrounds.
It was quite the good will gesture while it lasted - roughly ten years.
It wanted 27.6 nickels. Maybe use handkerchief next time.
Fs doesn't present the sweep data in results. Gotta do an arbitrary scan to get that, apparently.
[p.s.: They're BEASTS, substantially as advertised....
After 10 hours pink noise, 80 dBa @ 1M, LE14H-3 dropped Fs only 1.15 Hz. Vas increased somewhat. Butyl surround LE14H-3 has only minor parameter shifts after break-in:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote