- I can understand that / though / you may want to try a fitup of your 275nd diaphragm into a 2426 assembly at some time / just to get a feel for its' "different" sonic texture. .Originally Posted by Bernard
- I suspect that Zilch has encountered a "QC" issue that's mostly the result of the application ( by hand ? ) of the aquaplas coating. My 2, 2450SL diaphragms are different enough from each other that they really require different amounts of HF compensation from my passive hipasses .
- ie; ( & because of this experience ) I don't consider these JBL-shipped, aquaplas diaphragms to be a "plug & play" remedy to much of anything. Their QC is about the same as buying a carton of stock D8R2425 diaphragms .
- Sure, I'd recommend that you get a mkII network when you can and use it with your stock 2426 drivers. The voltage drives that Zilch produced ( above ) do indicate this newtork also gives more HF content ( it's a bit more tweeter like ).Originally Posted by Bernard
I know this advice is in contrast to something I've said previously ( I can't find that post right now ) / but whatever it was that I was thinking at the time / I was wrong . The mkIIs' LCR notchfilters lineup well enough with some undulations in my 2344/2426 workup that I can see that they are more driver/horn specific than diaphragm specific .
- Here's a .gif that represents a blast from the past ( when the 275nd was available as a part ).