Thank you Sir Lancer.
Somehow KNEW we'd get the solution, ultimately....
Thank you Sir Lancer.
Somehow KNEW we'd get the solution, ultimately....
It just hit me... it's like talking to a grown up velociraptor...Originally Posted by Mr. Widget
I ran across a voice coil part number list that showed the same number for a 2205 as 2215, 145 and on. I've never seen a 2205 does it have a thick head plate or was this a misprint. ( I'm assuming it can only be one or the other) also earlier in this thread it showes E145 and K145 not being interchangable. I realize the ceramic magnet is marginaly stronger) I know this gets done (at least I've been told so) whats the difference and is the K kit still around? Also I've yet to see the 135A listed anywhere I wouldn't care but I own two, I'm going to refoam them and who knows. It's sort of like you took a d130 and tried to make an LE14 out of it (sort of ). Some day would certainly be soon enough. Thank you.
I take it from reading this that if you used D130 or k130 frames as opposed to E
that you should be able to make a legitamate 2235. 9If it has spent it's life in somwones living room, otherwise it may need remaged) The alnico has 1.2 not 1.3 and as I understand it with the alnico you don't need the ring. Now, since this is so obvious to me, Their's probably something bib as a house that I have missed. So if someone could point out my error while maintaning the attitude that the rest of the country think we all have out here I'd appreciate it. Also in literature you can find LE15A with 1.2 and also with .9 each with the large mag assy and the thick head plate. Did this really happer or do writers consider themselfs artists and as such take licence now and again.
Can I assume you're talking about the mass ring? and if so, why would the magnetas I understand it with the alnico you don't need the ring.
material itself make any difference in whether or not the ring is needed to achieve
a specific electro-mechanical spec?
(if not the mass ring, then it's not at all clear to me what you're asking)
-grumpy
Because (and while it seems obvious, I didn't think of it, too many things that are obvious to me are at least in dispute) alnico conducts and acts as a short itself. They didn't start experiencing the problem that they corrected with the ring until they went to ferrite. (if I can remember things like that why don't I know where my pen is?)
We may not be talking about the same ring because as I use the search funtion I see a chart of rings of different weights. so I was (damn there's more I don't know about these things than I thought there even was to know) I read that there was a flux build up under certain (certain means I don't remember what) that caused a distortion that they hah not had with alnico and this was fixed with a shorting ring. I assumud there was only one ring but if this is actually mass added ti the moving assy then the mag material probably would be irelivent. Damn, I rebuilt my own auto trans in high school (had to having a packand trans worked on cost too much) and I had hardley even worked on a car, but you could get manuals and parts. Not quite the same here.
Ah. Magnetic structure shorting ring. Nothing to do with the mass ring. Nevermind. -grumpy
"[QUOTE=Thom;137267]Because ...... alnico conducts and acts as a short itself.
They didn't start experiencing the problem that they corrected with the ring until they went to ferrite. .....
We may not be talking about the same ring because as I use the search funtion I see a chart of rings of different weights. so I was ....
I read that there was a flux build up under certain ..........that caused a distortion that they hah not had with alnico
and this was fixed with a shorting ring. I assumud there was only one ring but if this is actually mass added ti
the moving assy then the mag material probably would be irelivent.}"
I expect that mass-ring reduce HF response and efficiency, but reducing Fs too, extends LF response.
This is a 5 year old thread?? Bottom line is use the correct kits in the correct frames and be done with it.
Rob
"I could be arguing in my spare time"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)