Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: DAT vs MD ?

  1. #1
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054

    DAT vs MD ?

    Back in the day when DAT tape machines came out, I really wanted one as cassette had reached as far as it could go. Picked up Sony mini disk mds-je320 about a year ago and have been impressed by it...its digital like the DAT and yes, I understand about the ATRAC, but its never bothered me.

    Last Friday I picked up a Sony mds-JB930..all the reviews call it an ES without the logo.
    http://www.minidisc.org/sony_mdsjb930_review.html

    http://www.minidisc.org/sony_jb930_review.html

    my old 320 was about 4-5 pounds where this one is 13 pounds and has the pro version of ATRAC R. It included the remote and owners manual. Anyway, I'm blown away with the quality and features. I monitor the XM and the Sony deck has a built-in 6 second buffer, so you get 6 seconds to decide if you want to record or not. If yes, it pulls the 6 out of the buffer and then tacks on the incoming data. Very cool.
    also it takes a PC keyboard input, you can do full editing and naming from the keyboard, and theres a chart to help you until you learn the keys. It is "hot swap" so you can attach k/b or pull it at anytime.
    Digital output filters are neat too.
    I guess the question is : anybody with A DAT recorder who can do a comparison ??
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  2. #2
    Super Moderator jblnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Mass
    Posts
    900
    I have 3 DAT machines in the house - all Sonys (PCM-R300, DTC-700, A7). I used to use them a fair amount and still have the R300 in my 2-channel main system. The converters in the R300 are the best of the 3 I have, and it's noticeable. A friend brougt over a portable Sony MD once and we did some listening. You can hear the compression artifacts on certain material, but it's not like a <128kb MP3 or anything.

    Since 2 of my 3 DATs are now dead or dying, I would say these weren't the best mechanical designs for the long term. They all have low hours and very little use but my guess is the belts or rubber parts have worn out.
    My guess is the MD is the better design for the long haul, but DAT will beat it in critical listening.

    jblnut

  3. #3
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    a really interesting article on ATRAC and hearing and masking , critical bands...etc

    http://www.minidisc.org/aes_atrac.html
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. DAT out of Hell
    By Fred Sanford in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-17-2007, 11:50 AM
  2. Does this sound right?
    By Boss96 in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-21-2004, 09:43 PM
  3. Opinions on the Crown MX-4 crossover
    By Tom Loizeaux in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-15-2003, 06:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •