While I do not dispute that your system may provide better imaging (though different listeners may have different ideas about what that term means) than several other systems regardless of cost, let's look at what imaging is for a second.
In the past folks claimed that a speaker imaged better if it was omni directional, or semi-omnidirectional like the Bose 901, or if the speaker was a dipole like a Maggie or electrostatic panel, or if the baffle was stepped for better time alignment like the Dahlquist DQ10, or had radiused or softened corners to avoid edge diffraction like the KEF 105 and original B&W 801, or it would be improved by probably a dozen other factors.
Today it is pretty widely understood that imaging is most influenced by the room, the loudspeaker's directivity, and their interaction.
With that understanding, I can certainly see how your controlling the radiation pattern of the Air Motion Transformer will effect the imaging, but that alone will not give you great imaging. You must also have a great room and you must have done everything else right too. Well done.
Widget